Coppermind talk:Editor's Corner

Stub to Complete Ratio

Stub to Complete Ratio is misleading.

Stub to Complete Ratio is 1.164. That 0.917 is Stub to Complete + Nearing Completion.

I think it should be 1.164 or 0.711 which is Stub to Complete + Nearing Completion + Partially Complete. -- boosiv

Agreed, I thought of this last night and I'll be reverting it soon. -- Chaos2651 (talk) 11:33, 19 April 2015 (MDT)

Yeah it made more sense for the previous way of thinking about article statuses, so I will make it better now. --Joe ST (talk) 11:36, 19 April 2015 (MDT)

Category: Places no longer exists. It should be removed.

Fairly self explanatory. I will put up the same argument on the Coppermind section of 17th Shard, but there is no point having a link to a category that doesn't exist.--TheYoungBard (talk) 00:31, 18 June 2015 (MDT)

We're currently in a transition period, thanks for bringing this up tho :D --Joe ST (talk) 00:52, 18 June 2015 (MDT)

Missing Articles

The majority of missing articles are links to Words of Radiance/Timeline‏‎. It looks like all of these come from the Words of Radiance summary pages (the separate pages for each chapter). I don't see an obvious way to fix it, but this looks like low-hanging fruit to get the missing article count down. Hadhad (talk) 08:19, 24 May 2016 (MDT)

I've been meaning to do a re-read of WoR so I can finish building/referencing this. Looks like I'll need to bump this up in priority.--WeiryWriter (talk) 08:58, 25 May 2016 (MST)

And just to be annoying, I changed the thing so it now counts all the (main namespace) articles that are missing rather than all the redlinks (aka each missing page is only counted once). --Joe ST (talk) 13:07, 27 May 2016 (MST)

Ref error in Camon

... but I don't know how to repair it. --2003:CB:F723:1B00:E1EF:E3B2:2CBC:52AD 07:56, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

Could you go into more detail on this? What is the error? Also, we probably should have done this on the Talk:Camon page but this is fine for now. -- Chaos2651 (talk) 04:30, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

Visual distinction between Cosmere and non-Cosmere works + title uniformity

Would it be possible to put a visual distinction (maybe a line or a larger space or something like that) between the Cosmere and non-Cosmere works on the start page?

In the same section I'd suggest to keep the books' or series' titles uniformly. For example right now some are using the full title (like The Emperor's Soul or Sixth Of The Dusk) while others are abbreviated (like Tress or Stormlight Archive) PanicPug (talk) 17:42, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

PanicPug, just to clarify, you're talking about Coppermind:Welcome not Coppermind:Editor's Corner, right? --Stargazer (talk) 18:20, 25 June 2024 (UTC)