◔
Difference between revisions of "Hav"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(refs and a bit more) |
m |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
{{quote|Kaladin could thank Hav for that, for training him to think in terms of 'us' and 'them.' ... Protect the 'us,' destroy the 'them.' A soldier had to think like that.|Kaladin while watching a fight between Alethi soldiers and Parshendi{{ref|b|sa1|c|57}}}} |
{{quote|Kaladin could thank Hav for that, for training him to think in terms of 'us' and 'them.' ... Protect the 'us,' destroy the 'them.' A soldier had to think like that.|Kaladin while watching a fight between Alethi soldiers and Parshendi{{ref|b|sa1|c|57}}}} |
||
− | When Kaladin and [[Bridge Four]] joined [[ |
+ | When Kaladin and [[Bridge Four]] joined the [[Battle of the Tower]] to help and rescue [[Dalinar]] and his men, Kaladin decided that they were "us" this day. |
{{quote|Us and them, he thought. That was the only way a soldier could think of it. For today, Dalinar Kholin and his men were part of the 'us.'|Kaladin's thoughts{{ref|b|sa1|c|67}}}} |
{{quote|Us and them, he thought. That was the only way a soldier could think of it. For today, Dalinar Kholin and his men were part of the 'us.'|Kaladin's thoughts{{ref|b|sa1|c|67}}}} |
Revision as of 19:08, 9 April 2013
Hav | |
---|---|
Homeworld | Roshar |
Hav was one of Kaladin's instructors in Amaram's army. He taught Kaladin to differentiate between the fellow soldiers and the foe.
“Kaladin could thank Hav for that, for training him to think in terms of 'us' and 'them.' ... Protect the 'us,' destroy the 'them.' A soldier had to think like that.”
—Kaladin while watching a fight between Alethi soldiers and ParshendiCite error: Invalid<ref>
tag; refs with no name must have content
When Kaladin and Bridge Four joined the Battle of the Tower to help and rescue Dalinar and his men, Kaladin decided that they were "us" this day.
“Us and them, he thought. That was the only way a soldier could think of it. For today, Dalinar Kholin and his men were part of the 'us.'”
—Kaladin's thoughtsCite error: Invalid<ref>
tag; refs with no name must have content
Notes
This article is a stub. Please help The Coppermind by expanding it.