Difference between revisions of "Talk:Aon"

From The Coppermind
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(42 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Merge with list? ==
+
== Missing Aon images ==
  +
There are images of several Aons in the tenth anniversary glossary that aren't on the wiki. Could somebody please create images for these Aons? (I don't know how to do it): Aon Ake, Aon Are, Aon Dii, Aon Eda, Aon Ehe, Aon Eno, Aon Kae, Aon Toa. Thank you! [[User:TomPN|TomPN]] ([[User talk:TomPN|talk]]) 03:33, 23 March 2017 (MST)
Is there a reason why this page and the List of Aons page are separate? It seems to me they should be combined.--[[User:WeiryWriter|WeiryWriter]] ([[User talk:WeiryWriter|talk]]) 23:19, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
 
   
  +
: Just adding that Aon Soo is missing [[User:Haelbarde|Haelbarde]] ([[User talk:Haelbarde|talk]])
: I think this page is supposed to talk about the science of Aon's where as the list discusses particulars. It might be better if they get merged though. Any opinions? --[[User:Fbstj|Joe ST]] ([[User talk:Fbstj|talk]]) 11:16, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
 
   
  +
: Aon Aor doesn't have a picture on it, do we just not know what it looks like? [[User:Enochole|Enochole]] ([[User talk:Enochole|Talk]]) 16:01, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
:: What do you mean about the "science of Aons"? I move that we delete this list. There's not really a huge amount of usefulness in putting the Aons in order of appearance, in my opinion. A comprehensive alphabetical list is better overall. However, there might be something useful in an Aon article, discussing the symbols themselves and their origin, rather than listing them, so I don't think we should do away with this article completely, simply rework it into a more useful form. --[[User:Windrunner|Windrunner]] ([[User talk:Windrunner|talk]]) 13:51, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
 
   
: I didn't really mean science, more what you said; history, general stuff, etc.. not really describing it well but heh --[[User:Fbstj|Joe ST]] ([[User talk:Fbstj|talk]]) 14:31, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
+
:: It doesn't look like it's in the Ars Arcanum and as far as I can tell the only reference to it as "Aor plantation," so I think you're right that we just don't know its appearance. --[[User:Stargazer|Stargazer]] ([[User talk:Stargazer|talk]]) 20:10, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
   
  +
== Reorganize Aon list ==
:I fully support merging List of Aons with this article. I think "Aon" should be the article we go with on that one. -- [[User:Chaos2651|Chaos2651]] ([[User talk:Chaos2651|talk]]) 20:48, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
 
   
  +
As it's currently laid out, the list of Aons is a bit unwieldy; the table of contents encroaches on the body of the article and the mix of images, quotes, section titles, and normal text makes it oddly spaced and difficult to read. On top of this, most individual Aons don't really have enough information associated with them to merit a full section anyway. I propose reformatting the page so that notable Aons (e.g. ones that are significant to the story or have long descriptions -- Aon, Ashe, maybe Daa, Ene, Nae, Omi, Rao, Reo, Shao, Tae, and Tia is my extremely rough list) get their own sections, followed by a table (with columns for name, picture, meaning, examples, and extra info) for the rest. I can make the edits myself, but I didn't want my first edit on the wiki to be a complete overhaul of a major page without at least getting some feedback first. Thoughts? [[User:Everlastingwonder|Everlastingwonder]] ([[User talk:Everlastingwonder|talk]]) 02:33, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
::I'm working on a mock-up of a new Aon page at the moment, will post on my user page when I get a little farther.--[[User:WeiryWriter|WeiryWriter]] ([[User talk:WeiryWriter|talk]]) 22:14, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
 
  +
: Welcome to the Coppermind! I've had similar thoughts about this article before, but never came up with a method I liked for reorganizing it. The Coppermind's [[Coppermind:Keepers|Keepers]] have been talking, and we like your idea, but we'd like a bit more time to think about some of the details. We can sometimes forget to come back to discussions that we table, so if you don't hear more in a week or so, feel free to give us a nudge either here or in the [https://discordapp.com/invite/KEv3fhN Coppermind editors Discord] (though we're pretty excited about this, so we should be good about staying on top of it). If you have any further thoughts, like how a table should be formatted, feel free to chime in on that as well (or if you have ideas about anything else, of course). In the meantime, we'd also like to say thank you for pointing out this issue ''and'' for looking for feedback before making sweeping changes. Happy editing!
  +
:--[[User:Stargazer|Stargazer]] ([[User talk:Stargazer|talk]]) 08:29, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
  +
: Okay, so we really like this idea. The one sort of tweak is that we'd like to put all Aons in the table, so that it's sort of like a complete dictionary. So, any Aons with too much detail to all fit in the table would get both a table entry and a section or something elsewhere with additional information. The one other concern we have is getting the table to look right. To that end, I've thrown together some markups [[User:Stargazer/General_Testing#Aon_Tables|here]]. I'm not exactly a design expert though, and I'm sure you probably have some ideas too, so we'd love to hear your thoughts. Once that's settled, I think you'll be good to go ahead and do this.
  +
:--[[User:Stargazer|Stargazer]] ([[User talk:Stargazer|talk]]) 00:26, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
   
  +
== Possible Aons ==
Okay I've finished with the mock-up of the new article ([[User:WeiryWriter/Aon]]) If anyone can think of anything else to add it would be helpful. Or I can go ahead and shift it to here.--[[User:WeiryWriter|WeiryWriter]] ([[User talk:WeiryWriter|talk]]) 19:16, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
 
  +
Based on the vowels (a,e,i,o) and consonants (d,h,k,l,m,n,p,r,s,sh,t) used in Aons so far, the number of each in each Aon (two vowels, one consonant) and the number of ways they can be combined (vowel-vowel-consonant, vowel-consonant-vowel, consonant-vowel-vowel), there are 4x4x11x3 (4 possibles for the first vowel, 4 possibles for the second vowel, 11 possibles for the consonant, and 3 ways they can be arranged) possible Aons, or 528.
   
  +
Aon Aeo proves that three-vowel Aons are also possible; there are 4x4x4 = 64 possible three-vowel Aons.
==His/Her vs. Their==
 
So, Joe made a couple alterations to the article, namely changing "his or her" to "their." Now I have always learned that this is incorrect, their is not singular. I discussed it with him over chat but he suggested that we get some outside input because neither one of us is going to agree the other. I think we should stick with more formal language for the wiki and as such [http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/595/01/ use correct grammar].--[[User:WeiryWriter|WeiryWriter]] ([[User talk:WeiryWriter|talk]]) 16:35, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
 
   
  +
All together, this means there are 528+64 = 592 possible Aons, without introducing more vowel or consonant sounds.
: Where as I am taking [http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/their wikipedia's] [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Their stance] as 'their' fits both and is just better reading. --[[User:Fbstj|Joe ST]] ([[User talk:Fbstj|talk]]) 17:29, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
 
  +
[[User:TomPN|TomPN]] ([[User talk:TomPN|talk]]) 17:25, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
   
  +
:[[User:TomPN|TomPN]], interesting to know, though I think for the purpose of anything we could put on the Coppermind, it'd be [[Help:Speculation|unduly speculative]] to use those numbers, since I don't think we know if all possible combinations are used or whether there might be additional sounds (entirely possible I'm forgetting and missing some WoB, in which case I'm happy to be corrected).
:[http://grammar.quickanddirtytips.com/he-they-generic-personal-pronoun.aspx Grammar Girl] recommends using "they," and I trust her judgment. Her rationalization is very good and she takes into account many style guides. I do not think we should use overly formal speech on the wiki. Since style guides cannot agree on a solution, I suggest we go with their. It is easier to write and easier to read. -- [[User:Chaos2651|Chaos2651]] ([[User talk:Chaos2651|talk]]) 19:02, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
 
  +
:--[[User:Stargazer|Stargazer]] ([[User talk:Stargazer|talk]]) 04:41, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
   
  +
==Aon Shao==
::Okay I read the Grammar Girl article and she mentions it is better to have a convention that people disagree with than to have no convention which I can agree with. I still totally disagree on using they/their but if that is the convention that is decided then so be it.--[[User:WeiryWriter|WeiryWriter]] ([[User talk:WeiryWriter|talk]]) 23:44, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
 
  +
I feel that was a valid interpretation of that illustration. We don't know the specifics of the curse that Tress was going to be subjected to but Charlie's obviously transformed him into a rat. All the other surrounding Aons most likely deal with what the curse transforms one into and the criteria and restrictions on breaking/fulfilling it. [[User:Lacrossedeamon|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon|talk]]) 04:18, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
   
  +
: The image, however, explicitly does not show the curse she was to put on Tress, but instead a spell used in her battle with Hoid. Therefore, I question its actual accuracy. [[User:Firesong|Firesong]] ([[User talk:Firesong|talk]]) 05:37, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
==Deleted Scenes==
 
So I finally got around to reading the Elantris deleted scenes and found a couple facts that could be added to this article.
 
   
  +
::I disagree. If you look at her outstretched arm and its relationship to the Aons, Hoid, and Tress it and the Aons are oriented towards Tress while Hoid is coming in from the side, surprising Riina, and throwing up the Edo Aon (supplemented with what looks like Daa Aons for power) that protected Tress as described in the book. She doesn't have a battle with Hoid; he stops the curse and from their it's just dialogue. The only contradiction is that the text describes Hoid imposing himself between Tress and Riina instead of off to the side but the way the illustration is drawn clarifies that Riina is targeting Tress with the Aonic formation. [[User:Lacrossedeamon|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon|talk]]) 05:48, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
"A triangle with wing-like protrusions from the side: Aon Eto." from [http://www.brandonsanderson.com/library/46/Elantris-Deleted-Scenes-The-Mad-Prince]
 
   
  +
::: I just find it questionable to use the art in Tress as a form of undeniable canon. These aren't as focused on being informative a things such as the Folios, Sketchbooks, and such from Stormlight. These are just illustrations of Howard Lyon's personal interpretation of scenes. [[User:Firesong|Firesong]] ([[User talk:Firesong|talk]]) 06:01, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
and
 
   
  +
::::That is fair. As I pointed out the illustration doesn't exactly line up with the text of the book (and given that the text is in universe narrated we don't know how well it lines up with what actually happened) but I would argue it's safe to accept it as broad strokes canon. At the very least I would assume it's not just Lyon's personal interpretation and he was coached on what Aons to include given that the Edo/Daa array (and Shao in Charlie's case) makes perfect sense in context of the narrative. [[User:Lacrossedeamon|Lacrossedeamon]] ([[User talk:Lacrossedeamon|talk]]) 06:17, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
"An Ate Seon can make a room completely silent for a short time, an Iam Seon age an object or person by a few years." from [http://www.brandonsanderson.com/library/48/Elantris-Alternate-Ending-Material]
 
   
  +
:::: Personally, I would say that with Isaac art directing, I imagine the Aons in the image were very much chosen intentionally. --[[User:Stargazer|Stargazer]] ([[User talk:Stargazer|talk]]) 08:46, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
I'm wondering how to handle the latter because Aon Iam is listed as meaning "Age" in the glossary on Brandon's Website but in the back of the book Glossary (and the article) Aon Ire has age as one of its meanings. How should this be handled?
 
   
  +
==Aon Daa==
Also, the coppermind stance on this sort of stuff is "use it unless it is contradicted by published canon" correct?--[[User:WeiryWriter|WeiryWriter]] ([[User talk:WeiryWriter|talk]]) 20:21, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
 
  +
In the aforementioned painting, Hoid uses Aon Daa to modify Aon Edo. Is this use of Aon Daa canon? Do we know for what purpose these Daa Aons were added, and what they do to the Aon equation? Also, should someone add the use of Aon Edo to block other Aons to this? It currently sounds like Aon Edo can only be used to block physical attacks, not attacks using investiture. [[User:Enochole|Enochole]] ([[User talk:Enochole|Talk]]) 21:57, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
:You could probably get away with adding it, as long as you make a footnote explaining that the material is from a deleted scene, and not necessarily canon. --[[User:Windrunner|Windrunner]] ([[User talk:Windrunner|talk]]) 05:16, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
 
   
I've added the information on Aon Eto and Aon Ate. I'm wary about Aon Iam because it does have the same meaning as a published Aon.--[[User:WeiryWriter|WeiryWriter]] ([[User talk:WeiryWriter|talk]]) 23:13, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
+
: My opinion would be that, given Isaac's art direction, we could consider the use of Edo and Shao to be canonical, but I don't think we can really say what the exact purpose of Daa was there. --[[User:Stargazer|Stargazer]] ([[User talk:Stargazer|talk]]) 20:12, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
   
== Split into aon pages ==
+
== Spacing in footnote ==
   
  +
The sole footnote has a weird space before "material" that isn't present in the template. Bug in the hack that makes WoBs? [[User:Nitpicking|Nitpicking]] ([[User talk:Nitpicking|talk]]) 01:28, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
So, we already have pages for each of the metals, and we have loads of single-line character pages. I was thinking we should split these up onto `Aon X` pages, like the `Seon X` pages we've started making, and then make [[AonDor]] into a similar page as the [[Allomancy]] and [[Feruchemy]] pages which have a table of metals which link to the actual articles. This would make this article into a disambiguation page? Anyone with opinions? I know you seem to like long pages for text-search reasons, Eric, and I don't really know what to say about that. --[[User:Fbstj|Joe ST]] ([[User talk:Fbstj|talk]]) 05:28, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
 
  +
:I don't really see the need for that personally. Most of these would just end up as really short articles, we don't have in depth info on more than like three or four of them. It just seems like a waste to me, currently. But then again, we have an article for every spren xD --[[User:Windrunner|Windrunner]] ([[User talk:Windrunner|talk]]) 05:46, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
 
:: That is my point, consistency XD --[[User:Fbstj|Joe ST]] ([[User talk:Fbstj|talk]]) 05:50, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
+
:I guess so? I have no idea why that’s there or how to fix it. I wish I could, because now that you point it out I can’t unsee it. [[User:Enochole|Enochole]] ([[User talk:Enochole|Talk]]) 01:59, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
  +
:I personally feel that Characters and Places are notable in and of themselves as special terms. If someone searched for a random place on Roshar, I want that place known and clearly in the search results. Especially since many places could ostensibly be expanded. There are some places that are not notable enough to have their own article, such as individual Ashmounts. I would reserve judgment that in Stormlight Archive, properties of individual spren could be expanded upon.
 
  +
: What's happening here is that it's forcing the footnote across multiple columns. I'll see if I can find a way to fix that. --[[User:Stargazer|Stargazer]] ([[User talk:Stargazer|talk]]) 20:07, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
:So, you talk of consistency. Well, what be our policy? I would say that this question should be deferred, as it will be very difficult to make a totally consistent policy on that. This is part of our problem in determining whether those random pieces of literature in Way of Kings should warrant their own article. That is a discussion we should have, but do ''not'' simplify it as you are both doing. It is very much not that easy. Largely it will come down to how we decide which pages are not notable enough for their article, and instead should be listed in an index. That's... tough. As I said, right now Characters and Places almost always have their own article, without exception (the only exception I can think of are the literature writers, for characters, and the Ashmounts for Places). I see no reason why we could not make this future policy dependent on which high level content category we are in.
 
  +
:With that out of the way, on the matter of this specific circumstance, I would say that each individual Aon is not noteworthy of an article in of themselves. You cannot possibly equate the two sentences of an Aon to the wealth of information we have on every metal. You wouldn't make an article on each Command, would you? You would, however, probably write articles for each metal, and possibly when we more of Stormlight, for each Surge or each Order of Radiant.
 
  +
== Elantris 10th Anniversary ==
:Anyway, can you tell I've had to listen lawyers all freaking week? XD The question of indices is an important one, and hey, I'll be the first to admit that we wanted character and place articles to boost the article count. But I kind of like having, say, the Rosharan category, and the Roshar category to be a complete description of characters and places there. We should probably have this conversation, because we kind of haphazardly did things in the wiki's early years. But, I largely feel we should defer this matter until we see Words of Radiance. A new book of that scale will test if our structure of the wiki has the proper expandability and adaptability we will require six books down the line. -- [[User:Chaos2651|Chaos2651]] ([[User talk:Chaos2651|talk]]) 06:14, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
 
  +
It says that this article isn't updated with information from the 10th anniversary edition of Elantris. I'm pretty sure it has been now, should that be taken out? [[User:Enochole|Enochole]] ([[User talk:Enochole|Talk]]) 16:19, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
:: I agree with your point re: ashmounds, and I kinda do like some index articles (for example, [[Shai]]'s modes, the people of [[Armedius Academy]], maybe even [[Stephen Leeds]]' aspects, and the [[Rithmatics]] lines and things. But also, there are a few of the Aon's that have a few paragraphs of content; it might be worth making at least a few Aon X articles? Considering that some of these 'indexes' have chunks of content, it might be viable/policy to indexify the spren stuff? --[[User:Fbstj|Joe ST]] ([[User talk:Fbstj|talk]]) 06:42, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
 
:::Wow, Chaos... That's quite a block of text. Reading it though, I can't say I find anything there I disagree with. I am vehemently opposed to making a spren index though. I like the little articles, and we're only going to get more details as the series goes on, such as what fabrials they're used in, properties of the spren, what form they bond with Parshendi to make, etc. In reality, the only three Aons worthy of their own page are the ones Brandon expanded on for the Badali jewelry page. I could see making a separate article for them, but they still need a place on the main index, with one of those little italicized, "main article" links, in my opinion. --[[User:Windrunner|Windrunner]] ([[User talk:Windrunner|talk]]) 06:53, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
 

Latest revision as of 20:12, 16 May 2023

Missing Aon images[edit]

There are images of several Aons in the tenth anniversary glossary that aren't on the wiki. Could somebody please create images for these Aons? (I don't know how to do it): Aon Ake, Aon Are, Aon Dii, Aon Eda, Aon Ehe, Aon Eno, Aon Kae, Aon Toa. Thank you! TomPN (talk) 03:33, 23 March 2017 (MST)

Just adding that Aon Soo is missing Haelbarde (talk)
Aon Aor doesn't have a picture on it, do we just not know what it looks like? Enochole (Talk) 16:01, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
It doesn't look like it's in the Ars Arcanum and as far as I can tell the only reference to it as "Aor plantation," so I think you're right that we just don't know its appearance. --Stargazer (talk) 20:10, 16 May 2023 (UTC)

Reorganize Aon list[edit]

As it's currently laid out, the list of Aons is a bit unwieldy; the table of contents encroaches on the body of the article and the mix of images, quotes, section titles, and normal text makes it oddly spaced and difficult to read. On top of this, most individual Aons don't really have enough information associated with them to merit a full section anyway. I propose reformatting the page so that notable Aons (e.g. ones that are significant to the story or have long descriptions -- Aon, Ashe, maybe Daa, Ene, Nae, Omi, Rao, Reo, Shao, Tae, and Tia is my extremely rough list) get their own sections, followed by a table (with columns for name, picture, meaning, examples, and extra info) for the rest. I can make the edits myself, but I didn't want my first edit on the wiki to be a complete overhaul of a major page without at least getting some feedback first. Thoughts? Everlastingwonder (talk) 02:33, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

Welcome to the Coppermind! I've had similar thoughts about this article before, but never came up with a method I liked for reorganizing it. The Coppermind's Keepers have been talking, and we like your idea, but we'd like a bit more time to think about some of the details. We can sometimes forget to come back to discussions that we table, so if you don't hear more in a week or so, feel free to give us a nudge either here or in the Coppermind editors Discord (though we're pretty excited about this, so we should be good about staying on top of it). If you have any further thoughts, like how a table should be formatted, feel free to chime in on that as well (or if you have ideas about anything else, of course). In the meantime, we'd also like to say thank you for pointing out this issue and for looking for feedback before making sweeping changes. Happy editing!
--Stargazer (talk) 08:29, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
Okay, so we really like this idea. The one sort of tweak is that we'd like to put all Aons in the table, so that it's sort of like a complete dictionary. So, any Aons with too much detail to all fit in the table would get both a table entry and a section or something elsewhere with additional information. The one other concern we have is getting the table to look right. To that end, I've thrown together some markups here. I'm not exactly a design expert though, and I'm sure you probably have some ideas too, so we'd love to hear your thoughts. Once that's settled, I think you'll be good to go ahead and do this.
--Stargazer (talk) 00:26, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

Possible Aons[edit]

Based on the vowels (a,e,i,o) and consonants (d,h,k,l,m,n,p,r,s,sh,t) used in Aons so far, the number of each in each Aon (two vowels, one consonant) and the number of ways they can be combined (vowel-vowel-consonant, vowel-consonant-vowel, consonant-vowel-vowel), there are 4x4x11x3 (4 possibles for the first vowel, 4 possibles for the second vowel, 11 possibles for the consonant, and 3 ways they can be arranged) possible Aons, or 528.

Aon Aeo proves that three-vowel Aons are also possible; there are 4x4x4 = 64 possible three-vowel Aons.

All together, this means there are 528+64 = 592 possible Aons, without introducing more vowel or consonant sounds. TomPN (talk) 17:25, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

TomPN, interesting to know, though I think for the purpose of anything we could put on the Coppermind, it'd be unduly speculative to use those numbers, since I don't think we know if all possible combinations are used or whether there might be additional sounds (entirely possible I'm forgetting and missing some WoB, in which case I'm happy to be corrected).
--Stargazer (talk) 04:41, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Aon Shao[edit]

I feel that was a valid interpretation of that illustration. We don't know the specifics of the curse that Tress was going to be subjected to but Charlie's obviously transformed him into a rat. All the other surrounding Aons most likely deal with what the curse transforms one into and the criteria and restrictions on breaking/fulfilling it. Lacrossedeamon (talk) 04:18, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

The image, however, explicitly does not show the curse she was to put on Tress, but instead a spell used in her battle with Hoid. Therefore, I question its actual accuracy. Firesong (talk) 05:37, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
I disagree. If you look at her outstretched arm and its relationship to the Aons, Hoid, and Tress it and the Aons are oriented towards Tress while Hoid is coming in from the side, surprising Riina, and throwing up the Edo Aon (supplemented with what looks like Daa Aons for power) that protected Tress as described in the book. She doesn't have a battle with Hoid; he stops the curse and from their it's just dialogue. The only contradiction is that the text describes Hoid imposing himself between Tress and Riina instead of off to the side but the way the illustration is drawn clarifies that Riina is targeting Tress with the Aonic formation. Lacrossedeamon (talk) 05:48, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
I just find it questionable to use the art in Tress as a form of undeniable canon. These aren't as focused on being informative a things such as the Folios, Sketchbooks, and such from Stormlight. These are just illustrations of Howard Lyon's personal interpretation of scenes. Firesong (talk) 06:01, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
That is fair. As I pointed out the illustration doesn't exactly line up with the text of the book (and given that the text is in universe narrated we don't know how well it lines up with what actually happened) but I would argue it's safe to accept it as broad strokes canon. At the very least I would assume it's not just Lyon's personal interpretation and he was coached on what Aons to include given that the Edo/Daa array (and Shao in Charlie's case) makes perfect sense in context of the narrative. Lacrossedeamon (talk) 06:17, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
Personally, I would say that with Isaac art directing, I imagine the Aons in the image were very much chosen intentionally. --Stargazer (talk) 08:46, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

Aon Daa[edit]

In the aforementioned painting, Hoid uses Aon Daa to modify Aon Edo. Is this use of Aon Daa canon? Do we know for what purpose these Daa Aons were added, and what they do to the Aon equation? Also, should someone add the use of Aon Edo to block other Aons to this? It currently sounds like Aon Edo can only be used to block physical attacks, not attacks using investiture. Enochole (Talk) 21:57, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

My opinion would be that, given Isaac's art direction, we could consider the use of Edo and Shao to be canonical, but I don't think we can really say what the exact purpose of Daa was there. --Stargazer (talk) 20:12, 16 May 2023 (UTC)

Spacing in footnote[edit]

The sole footnote has a weird space before "material" that isn't present in the template. Bug in the hack that makes WoBs? Nitpicking (talk) 01:28, 16 May 2023 (UTC)

I guess so? I have no idea why that’s there or how to fix it. I wish I could, because now that you point it out I can’t unsee it. Enochole (Talk) 01:59, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
What's happening here is that it's forcing the footnote across multiple columns. I'll see if I can find a way to fix that. --Stargazer (talk) 20:07, 16 May 2023 (UTC)

Elantris 10th Anniversary[edit]

It says that this article isn't updated with information from the 10th anniversary edition of Elantris. I'm pretty sure it has been now, should that be taken out? Enochole (Talk) 16:19, 16 May 2023 (UTC)