12,422
edits
Difference between revisions of "User talk:Cem"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
Protected "User talk:Cem": Recent vandalism from IPs. ([Edit=Allow only editors] (expires 16:07, 20 March 2020 (UTC)) [Move=Allow only editors] (expires 16:07, 20 March 2020 (UTC)))
(Added tense discussion) |
m (Protected "User talk:Cem": Recent vandalism from IPs. ([Edit=Allow only editors] (expires 16:07, 20 March 2020 (UTC)) [Move=Allow only editors] (expires 16:07, 20 March 2020 (UTC)))) |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
|
Forgive me if this was your intent all along and I simply misread you.
--[[User:Kurkistan|Kurkistan]] ([[User talk:Kurkistan|talk]]) 21:15, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
:I disagree with the reversion. I think it should still be present tense, it is still during the time frame of the books and it isn't part of a history section. That article is short enough that it feels disjointed that it isn't all one tense, especially since the tense change isn't designated by a section change (i.e. History section header)--[[User:WeiryWriter|WeiryWriter]] ([[User talk:WeiryWriter|talk]]) 23:39, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
::Man, here I was trying to be all reasonable, but I'll cede the point and acknowledge my initial rightness, Weiry. ;) --[[User:Kurkistan|Kurkistan]] ([[User talk:Kurkistan|talk]]) 15:18, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
| |||