Difference between revisions of "Talk:Nahel bond"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (resolved) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Spren of Bondsmiths== |
==Spren of Bondsmiths== |
||
Please leave the "spren type" for and Bondsmiths as "unique" at this time. The type isn't "unknown"--we likely know as much as we ever will about what "type" of spren Stormfather is. And "Bondsmith" or "Bondsmith spren" isn't quite right either, and doesn't tell anything besides the obvious. "Unique" expresses the fact that there are no other spren of it's type. --[[User:Jofwu|Jofwu]] ([[User talk:Jofwu|talk]]) 19:48, 12 December 2017 (MST) |
Please leave the "spren type" for and Bondsmiths as "unique" at this time. The type isn't "unknown"--we likely know as much as we ever will about what "type" of spren Stormfather is. And "Bondsmith" or "Bondsmith spren" isn't quite right either, and doesn't tell anything besides the obvious. "Unique" expresses the fact that there are no other spren of it's type. --[[User:Jofwu|Jofwu]] ([[User talk:Jofwu|talk]]) 19:48, 12 December 2017 (MST) |
||
That's fine I disagree that is all we will ever know but unqiue works but Nale should still be on that list and the Renarin's Spren is corrupted. -- Arook |
|||
Revision as of 15:17, 13 December 2017
Spren of Bondsmiths
Please leave the "spren type" for and Bondsmiths as "unique" at this time. The type isn't "unknown"--we likely know as much as we ever will about what "type" of spren Stormfather is. And "Bondsmith" or "Bondsmith spren" isn't quite right either, and doesn't tell anything besides the obvious. "Unique" expresses the fact that there are no other spren of it's type. --Jofwu (talk) 19:48, 12 December 2017 (MST)
That's fine I disagree that is all we will ever know but unqiue works but Nale should still be on that list and the Renarin's Spren is corrupted. -- Arook