Talk:Shardhammer
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Missing information?[edit]
Why does every article seem to have the "This article is missing information" comment? --Voidbinder (talk) 18:44, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
- That notice appears on every page marked as a
{{stub}}. Which is one of four article classifications (the others being{{complete}},{{partial}}, and{{exemplary}}) that we admins use to keep track of quality on the Coppermind. If you believe an article to no longer be a stub please bring it to our attention and we'll look it over and update the tag.--WeiryWriter (talk) 18:58, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
- Is it possible that an article can be a stub and still contain all the available information on it's subject? Then would it still be appropriate to have that comment? --Voidbinder (talk) 19:32, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
- If an article has all of the current relevant knowledge then it should get marked as
{{complete}}.--WeiryWriter (talk) 19:48, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
- It's possible, I'll try and take a look at it this weekend. We also need to come up with formalized sections for weapons and things...--WeiryWriter (talk) 21:16, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
- Surely more information will come to light with additional SA novels. I searched both books for "warhammer", "hammer" and "shardhammer" and I think I gleaned all the relevant information. A second set of eyes would be great though. It's important to note, as well, that it was never called a Shardhammer until the second book. --Voidbinder (talk) 03:19, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
- Chapters with mentions of hammers:
- WoK
- 6, 21, 27, 28, 40, 56, 65, 66, 69
- WoR
- 4, 24, 26, 29, 30, 32, 49, 51, 56, 57, 60, 67, 68, 81, 86
- --Joe ST (talk) 11:45, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
- Not all hammers spoken of are shardhammers. Hammers are used by common soldiers to fight Parshendi. I'll search again, but my usual method is to search for the term in an ebook and read each instance. Thanks! --Voidbinder (talk) 06:19, 2 March 2015 (UTC)