Difference between revisions of "Talk:Sazed"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Where does the word ''Vaht'' come from? Add it in somewhere [[User:Fbstj|Joe ST]] 06:36, 18 June 2011 (UTC) |
Where does the word ''Vaht'' come from? Add it in somewhere [[User:Fbstj|Joe ST]] 06:36, 18 June 2011 (UTC) |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
+ | :::Good catch Chaos, how unsurprising that you'd know all about this :p [[User:Fbstj|Joe ST]] 07:48, 19 June 2011 (UTC) |
||
⚫ | |||
+ | ::::I know, you're shocked. - Chaos |
||
⚫ | |||
− | -Chaos |
||
+ | == Sections == |
||
⚫ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Hmmmm, I don't know if this article is better or worse for the excessive use of 'for more info' bits. It would probably be better if each section merely mentioned/linked to the 'more' page in its main body, rather than specifically mentioning more information. --[[User:Fbstj|Joe ST]] ([[User talk:Fbstj|talk]]) 11:47, 12 April 2013 (UTC) |
||
+ | :I definitely agree, it's way overdone here. -- [[User:Chaos2651|Chaos2651]] ([[User talk:Chaos2651|talk]]) 05:10, 15 April 2013 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 05:10, 15 April 2013
Vaht[edit]
Where does the word Vaht come from? Add it in somewhere Joe ST 06:36, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
- Master Vaht is Sazed's false identity when he is pretending to be Valette Renoux's steward. If it is too confusing or obscure, it can be removed or put only as a side note on Sazed's main page. -Chachel
- "Master Vaht" is actually the proper title used to address Terrismen. To wit:
- "“Probably,” Cosahn said. “But I cannot perform miracles, Master Vaht.”
- Sazed nodded. “Vaht” was, apparently, the proper title for a Terrisman steward. Not quite skaa, but definitely not noblemen, the Terrismen held a very strange place in imperial society. " -Chaos
- Ah. There we go. I'll stick that on the Terris page. I knew something was wrong with what I wrote but I couldn't exactly remember. -Chach
- Good catch Chaos, how unsurprising that you'd know all about this :p Joe ST 07:48, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
- I know, you're shocked. - Chaos
Sections[edit]
Hmmmm, I don't know if this article is better or worse for the excessive use of 'for more info' bits. It would probably be better if each section merely mentioned/linked to the 'more' page in its main body, rather than specifically mentioning more information. --Joe ST (talk) 11:47, 12 April 2013 (UTC)