Difference between revisions of "Talk:Sazed"

From The Coppermind
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 14: Line 14:
   
 
::::I know, you're shocked. - Chaos
 
::::I know, you're shocked. - Chaos
  +
  +
== Sections ==
  +
  +
Hmmmm, I don't know if this article is better or worse for the excessive use of 'for more info' bits. It would probably be better if each section merely mentioned/linked to the 'more' page in its main body, rather than specifically mentioning more information. --[[User:Fbstj|Joe ST]] ([[User talk:Fbstj|talk]]) 11:47, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
  +
:I definitely agree, it's way overdone here. -- [[User:Chaos2651|Chaos2651]] ([[User talk:Chaos2651|talk]]) 05:10, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 05:10, 15 April 2013

Vaht[edit]

Where does the word Vaht come from? Add it in somewhere Joe ST 06:36, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

Master Vaht is Sazed's false identity when he is pretending to be Valette Renoux's steward. If it is too confusing or obscure, it can be removed or put only as a side note on Sazed's main page. -Chachel
"Master Vaht" is actually the proper title used to address Terrismen. To wit:
"“Probably,” Cosahn said. “But I cannot perform miracles, Master Vaht.”
Sazed nodded. “Vaht” was, apparently, the proper title for a Terrisman steward. Not quite skaa, but definitely not noblemen, the Terrismen held a very strange place in imperial society. " -Chaos
Ah. There we go. I'll stick that on the Terris page. I knew something was wrong with what I wrote but I couldn't exactly remember. -Chach
Good catch Chaos, how unsurprising that you'd know all about this :p Joe ST 07:48, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
I know, you're shocked. - Chaos

Sections[edit]

Hmmmm, I don't know if this article is better or worse for the excessive use of 'for more info' bits. It would probably be better if each section merely mentioned/linked to the 'more' page in its main body, rather than specifically mentioning more information. --Joe ST (talk) 11:47, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

I definitely agree, it's way overdone here. -- Chaos2651 (talk) 05:10, 15 April 2013 (UTC)