Difference between revisions of "Talk:Knights Radiant"

From The Coppermind
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Corrupted Truthwatchers?)
 
m (oops, didn't realize I was logged out)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Should this article have a section on the corrupted Truthwatchers? [[User:Nitpicking|Nitpicking]] ([[User talk:Nitpicking|talk]]) 22:54, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
 
Should this article have a section on the corrupted Truthwatchers? [[User:Nitpicking|Nitpicking]] ([[User talk:Nitpicking|talk]]) 22:54, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
  +
  +
:Hi, sorry for the very delayed reply! It seems like this page might be better suited for just giving an overview of the Knights Radiant as a whole- the organization, its history, and a brief description of the orders. Information regarding corrupted Truthwatchers has more to do with that order in particular and would fit better on the page for the Truthwatchers itself (see [[Order_of_Truthwatchers#Enlightened|this section]]); on this page, maybe just a general statement about the possibility of bonding a spren which has been enlightened would be appropriate, but no need to go into such detail that it requires a whole section. —[[User:Truthwatch3r|Truthwatch3r]] ([[User talk:Truthwatch3r|talk]]) 15:39, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
  +
  +
::That makes perfect sense. [[User:Nitpicking|Nitpicking]] ([[User talk:Nitpicking|talk]]) 02:35, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 02:35, 8 July 2023

Should this article have a section on the corrupted Truthwatchers? Nitpicking (talk) 22:54, 4 May 2023 (UTC)

Hi, sorry for the very delayed reply! It seems like this page might be better suited for just giving an overview of the Knights Radiant as a whole- the organization, its history, and a brief description of the orders. Information regarding corrupted Truthwatchers has more to do with that order in particular and would fit better on the page for the Truthwatchers itself (see this section); on this page, maybe just a general statement about the possibility of bonding a spren which has been enlightened would be appropriate, but no need to go into such detail that it requires a whole section. —Truthwatch3r (talk) 15:39, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
That makes perfect sense. Nitpicking (talk) 02:35, 8 July 2023 (UTC)