Difference between revisions of "Talk:Women's script"
Active discussions
(→Formatting: new section) |
|||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Formatting == |
== Formatting == |
||
With permission, I'd like to change the layout into a table, so the five by five character sets are more immediately obvious.<br> |
With permission, I'd like to change the layout into a table, so the five by five character sets are more immediately obvious.<br /> |
||
I also question if it's necessary to repeat the maximum height character 5 times as it is currently is. |
I also question if it's necessary to repeat the maximum height character 5 times as it is currently is.<br /> |
||
[[User:ParshendiOfRhuidean|ParshendiOfRhuidean]] ([[User talk:ParshendiOfRhuidean|talk]]) 20:54, 23 January 2023 (UTC) |
|||
: Table formatting sounds reasonable to me, though it may be helpful to keep the maximum height character on each line if we're now actually forcing each set on a new line. --[[User:Stargazer|Stargazer]] ([[User talk:Stargazer|talk]]) 22:59, 23 January 2023 (UTC) |
|||
:: Thanks for confirmation, I'll get on it tomorrow. |
|||
::: [[User:ParshendiOfRhuidean|ParshendiOfRhuidean]] ([[User talk:ParshendiOfRhuidean|talk]]) 23:09, 23 January 2023 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 23:09, 23 January 2023
FormattingEdit
With permission, I'd like to change the layout into a table, so the five by five character sets are more immediately obvious.
I also question if it's necessary to repeat the maximum height character 5 times as it is currently is.
ParshendiOfRhuidean (talk) 20:54, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
- Table formatting sounds reasonable to me, though it may be helpful to keep the maximum height character on each line if we're now actually forcing each set on a new line. --Stargazer (talk) 22:59, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for confirmation, I'll get on it tomorrow.
- ParshendiOfRhuidean (talk) 23:09, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for confirmation, I'll get on it tomorrow.