40,275
edits
Difference between revisions of "Category:Article statuses"
m
tweaks
m (Fbstj moved page Category:Article Statuses to Category:Article statuses without leaving a redirect) |
m (tweaks) |
||
|
In short, article qualities go as such:
{{t|stub}} are for short, terrible articles that need expanding. Stubs are bad. These can either graduate to {{t|complete}} status--which indicates that though the article is short, it has all the possible knowledge on the subject--or
{{t|
Articles in the [[:
{{t|exemplary}} articles are the best articles on the Coppermind. They contain a wealth of information, and are conceivably totally complete with their treatment at hand. ▼
▲{{t|exemplary}} articles are the best articles on the Coppermind. They contain a wealth of information, and are conceivably totally complete with their treatment at hand.
Notable articles are slightly outside of this hierarchy. They are simply a tag which indicates the '''importance''' of an article, instead of its actual quality. These should aim to be Exemplary.▼
▲[[:category: notable articles|Notable articles]] are slightly outside of this hierarchy. They are simply a tag which indicates the '''importance''' of an article, instead of its actual quality. These should aim to be Exemplary.
▲Articles in the [[:Category: Articles nearing completion|nearly Complete]] category need reviewing to make sure they are exhaustive in their descriptions.
[[
| |||