11,554
edits
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Surgebinding"
→Isomere's theory
(→Isomere's theory: new section) |
|||
|
Hey Isomere, I think we will be removing your theory, since it's so new. You yourself stated in the section that its premature. Until they have been accepted and critiqued by a number of people, I don't think it's worthy of a full section. I will leave it for now, until others have had input. --[[User:Fbstj|Joe ST]] ([[User talk:Fbstj|talk]]) 18:06, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
:Oops, I didn't see this here; I had posted my response to you on your talk page, Isomere. I agree the theory is strongly premature. In fact I am uncomfortable with any theory on here that claims to know additional Surges, just as I would be uncomfortable with putting what people think could be Shards on the Shard page. Additionally, regarding Cultivation's relevance to Surgebinding, I'm... also uncomfortable with that claim. I am very certain that we can say that Surgebinding is of Honor, but I am uncomfortable displaying that it is of Cultivation as well without more concrete evidence. -- [[User:Chaos2651|Chaos2651]] ([[User talk:Chaos2651|talk]]) 01:08, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
| |||