40,275
edits
m (→Missing information?: reply) |
m (bump) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Why does every article seem to have the "This article is missing information" comment? --[[User:Voidbinder|Voidbinder]] ([[User talk:Voidbinder|talk]]) 18:44, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
:That notice appears on every page marked as a {{t|stub}}. Which is one of four article classifications (the others being {{t|complete}}, {{t|
::Is it possible that an article can be a stub and still contain all the available information on it's subject? Then would it still be appropriate to have that comment? --[[User:Voidbinder|Voidbinder]] ([[User talk:Voidbinder|talk]]) 19:32, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
:;WoR: 4, 24, 26, 29, 30, 32, 49, 51, 56, 57, 60, 67, 68, 81, 86
: --[[User:Fbstj|Joe ST]] ([[User talk:Fbstj|talk]]) 11:45, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
::Not all hammers spoken of are shardhammers. Hammers are used by common soldiers to fight Parshendi. I'll search again, but my usual method is to search for the term in an ebook and read each instance. Thanks! --[[User:Voidbinder|Voidbinder]] ([[User talk:Voidbinder|talk]]) 06:19, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
:Is this complete/resolved? --[[User:Fbstj|Joe ST]] ([[User talk:Fbstj|talk]]) 12:56, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
|