Editors
3,886
edits
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Iriali"
no edit summary
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
|
::: The evidence is in the lack of evidence that there are multiple groups. We assume there is one because only one has ever been mentioned. Sure it definitely *could* be several groups, but we just can't know that for sure. Would be reasonable to say it could be a subgroup, I guess, if you can provide evidence that suggests the possibility. --[[User:Firesong]] 19:28, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
:::: Could it not be said just as well that the evidence for multiple groups is the lack of evidence that there is only one group? Why assume anything at all? Why present information as factual that we already know isn't confirmed, instead of just saying, it could be one of a few possibilities? What is gained by presenting speculation as fact? -- [[User:Oudeis]] 19:39, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
::::: Personally I do not think that presenting anything not 100% confirmed as speculation would be a good move. At the end of the day a large amount of content is not 100% confirmed by the books or Brandon themselves, most of the site would probably have to be tagged for one reason or another under this policy. In cases like this consensus would seem best to follow and the current consensus seems to be that there is most probably only one Irali group.--[[User:Debarra|Debarra]] ([[User talk:Debarra|talk]]) 19:44, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
| |||