Difference between revisions of "User talk:Meg"

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
== twok or sa1 ==
 
@Joe: I'm prone of using twok in my references but I saw (extreme-idling on the wiki because the forum seems down) that you changed twok in sa1. So I see that both of them don't really work on the same page now my question: should I better use sa1 than twok? Don't want you to be forced to edit all my references :P. --[[User:Meg|Meg]] ([[User talk:Meg|talk]]) 16:20, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
 
:Unless I'm mistaken, either or should be fine, every editor has his or her preference. Like I like using "tfe" instead of "mistborn 1" for example.
:: Hey Meg. You may have noticed that when you have two refs to chapter 7 (say), but each has a different book identifier (sa1/twok, mb1/tfe, e/elantris, etc) they get shown as two different references. I just had an idea how to fix this... XD but I prefer sa1/mb1/etc as they may lead to less ambiguity in the future; in cases where we have books with similar initialisms, we might as well use the series as the id. That's the reasoning behind 'sa1', and its my preference only. I do usually go through and convert them if I spot them, because I'm strange :D and I enjoy editing :P --[[User:Fbstj|Joe ST]] ([[User talk:Fbstj|talk]]) 17:44, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
:: EDIT: done, mix and match as you like :)
 
:::Thanks :) So I didn't mix them up, but mostly used twok
:::@Windrunner: fine :) I'm curious. [[User:Meg|Meg]] ([[User talk:Meg|talk]]) 18:51, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
861

edits

Navigation menu