40,275
edits
Difference between revisions of "User talk:Blaze1616"
m
→Reverting your family mergers: repl;u
WeiryWriter (talk | contribs) |
m (→Reverting your family mergers: repl;u) |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
|
::Thanks for the welcome. I would greatly appreciate a style guide if one will be rolling out. There is no sense in performing heavy edits when you'll just have to edit it again later. I had found the style guide-ish page yesterday while browsing, but it didn't contain all that much. Thanks again! --[[User:Blaze1616|Blaze1616]] ([[User talk:Blaze1616|talk]]) 14:44, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
::P.S., if responding to a comment on my talk page, is it preferred to respond on my talk page as well, or go to the other person's talk page, like I did here? Just something that would be good to know.
: It's usually easier to reply in the same place as the thing you're replying too, especially since we tend to check all edits and see that things have been added. Feel free to do your edits prior to a style guide as we tend to prefer having the content for people to read from than having it all formatted the same. Thanks :D --[[User:Fbstj|Joe ST]] ([[User talk:Fbstj|talk]]) 15:08, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
:I've moved this conversation here, just to keep everything in one place. And I did get a good chunk of the style guide done today so I'll try typing it up. I'll have to speak with the other admins about finalizing it though.--[[User:WeiryWriter|WeiryWriter]] ([[User talk:WeiryWriter|talk]]) 19:33, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
::Take your time. I'm not certain as to when I'll be able to start my reread, though I am hopeful it will be soon. I guess the point I am trying to say is to not hurry on my behalf. --[[User:Blaze1616|Blaze1616]] ([[User talk:Blaze1616|talk]]) 20:18, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
== Reverting your family mergers ==
hey Blaze, I just went through and reverted your latest set of edits where you added |merge-family=y to a bunch of articles with lots of family entries? I made that setting to remove the 'inner table' on pages with only single 'family' rows, but until we decide other-wise (given your dislike for the inner table, maybe others don't like it either?) we'd rather they stay like they were. If you have an issue with their relative size/shape or their formatting (like maybe the table needs a better border to make it more distinct?) then we can fiddle with that instead --[[User:Fbstj|Joe ST]] ([[User talk:Fbstj|talk]]) 07:44, 25 June 2015 (MDT)
:Oh, my apologies then. I hadn't realized there was a reason for not merging the borders. I was only doing it because my OCD gland was itching. Thanks for letting me know! --[[User:Blaze1616|Blaze1616]] ([[User talk:Blaze1616|talk]]) 08:06, 25 June 2015 (MDT)
:: No need to apologise, I haven't really documented that and it's kinda magical and there's no policy about it, so it's not your fault XD. We really could do with some help figuring out what that part should look like, and whether there are any other parts of {{t|character}} or other infoboxes that can benefit from being grouped more distinctly. And also how they should look to look good and distinct and stuff --[[User:Fbstj|Joe ST]] ([[User talk:Fbstj|talk]]) 08:12, 25 June 2015 (MDT)
:::I'd be happy to partake in discussions regarding infoboxes. I just need to know where they are happening, and, if real-time conversation is preferred, when. --[[User:Blaze1616|Blaze1616]] ([[User talk:Blaze1616|talk]]) 08:24, 25 June 2015 (MDT)
:: Indeed, I also need to figure out where/when/how these kindsa discussion will/should take place XD --[[User:Fbstj|Joe ST]] ([[User talk:Fbstj|talk]]) 08:40, 25 June 2015 (MDT)
| |||