Difference between revisions of "Coppermind talk:Editor's Corner"

From The Coppermind
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (+repoly)
Line 4: Line 4:
 
That 0.917 is Stub to Complete + Nearing Completion.
 
That 0.917 is Stub to Complete + Nearing Completion.
   
I think it should be 1.164 or 0.711 which is Stub to Complete + Nearing Completion + Partially Complete. -- [[User:Boosiv|Boosive]]
+
I think it should be 1.164 or 0.711 which is Stub to Complete + Nearing Completion + Partially Complete. -- [[User:Boosiv|boosiv]]
   
 
:Agreed, I thought of this last night and I'll be reverting it soon. -- [[User:Chaos2651|Chaos2651]] ([[User talk:Chaos2651|talk]]) 11:33, 19 April 2015 (MDT)
 
:Agreed, I thought of this last night and I'll be reverting it soon. -- [[User:Chaos2651|Chaos2651]] ([[User talk:Chaos2651|talk]]) 11:33, 19 April 2015 (MDT)

Revision as of 17:48, 19 April 2015

Stub to Complete Ratio is misleading.

Stub to Complete Ratio is 1.164. That 0.917 is Stub to Complete + Nearing Completion.

I think it should be 1.164 or 0.711 which is Stub to Complete + Nearing Completion + Partially Complete. -- boosiv

Agreed, I thought of this last night and I'll be reverting it soon. -- Chaos2651 (talk) 11:33, 19 April 2015 (MDT)
Yeah it made more sense for the previous way of thinking about article statuses, so I will make it better now. --Joe ST (talk) 11:36, 19 April 2015 (MDT)