Difference between revisions of "Coppermind talk:Editor's Corner"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (+repoly) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
That 0.917 is Stub to Complete + Nearing Completion. |
That 0.917 is Stub to Complete + Nearing Completion. |
||
I think it should be 1.164 or 0.711 which is Stub to Complete + Nearing Completion + Partially Complete. |
I think it should be 1.164 or 0.711 which is Stub to Complete + Nearing Completion + Partially Complete. -- [[User:Boosiv|Boosive]] |
||
:Agreed, I thought of this last night and I'll be reverting it soon. -- [[User:Chaos2651|Chaos2651]] ([[User talk:Chaos2651|talk]]) 11:33, 19 April 2015 (MDT) |
:Agreed, I thought of this last night and I'll be reverting it soon. -- [[User:Chaos2651|Chaos2651]] ([[User talk:Chaos2651|talk]]) 11:33, 19 April 2015 (MDT) |
||
:: Yeah it made more sense for the previous way of thinking about article statuses, so I will make it better now. --[[User:Fbstj|Joe ST]] ([[User talk:Fbstj|talk]]) 11:36, 19 April 2015 (MDT) |
|||
Revision as of 17:36, 19 April 2015
Stub to Complete Ratio is misleading.
Stub to Complete Ratio is 1.164. That 0.917 is Stub to Complete + Nearing Completion.
I think it should be 1.164 or 0.711 which is Stub to Complete + Nearing Completion + Partially Complete. -- Boosive