Editing Category:Article statuses

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 1: Line 1:
−
This category is for classifications of article quality. It should not include article tags, {{t|attention}}, its [[:category:articles in need of attention|subcategories]], or other tags like {{t|theory}} or {{t|spoilers}}.
+
This category is for classifications of article quality. It should not include article tags, like Theory or Attention.
   
 
In short, article qualities go as such:
  
In short, article qualities go as such:
   
−
{{t|stub}} articles are short, terrible, and need expanding. Stubs are bad. These can either graduate to {{t|complete}} status—which indicates that though the article is short, it has all the possible knowledge on the subject—or {{t|partial}} status.
 +
{{t|stub}} are for short, terrible articles that need expanding. Stubs are bad. These can either graduate to {{t|complete}} status--which indicates that though the article is short, it has all the possible knowledge on the subject--or partial status.
   
−
{{t|partial}} articles are articles which are too long to be considered mere stubs, but still need to be improved. These are usually on meaty subjects like main characters, where the info in the article is obviously longer than a stub, but doesn't contain everything that could be said about the character.
 +
{{t|partial}} articles are articles which are too long to be considered mere stubs, but could still be improved. These are usually on meaty subjects like main characters, where the info in the article is obviously longer than a stub, but doesn't contain everything that could be said about the character.
   
−
{{t|complete}} articles are articles that are likely complete, but still need to be [[:category:complete articles|reviewed]] by a [[Coppermind:Keepers|Keeper]] to make sure they are exhaustive and well-formatted.
 +
Articles in the [[:category: articles nearing completion|nearly Complete]] category need reviewing to make sure they are exhaustive in their descriptions.
   
−
{{t|exemplary}} articles fall outside of the normal article hierarchy; they are not part of the ordinary progression of article quality and sit above reviewed articles. They are the best articles on the Coppermind, and contain a wealth of information, and are conceivably totally complete with their treatment at hand. This tag is also added by the Keepers.
 +
{{t|exemplary}} articles are the best articles on the Coppermind. They contain a wealth of information, and are conceivably totally complete with their treatment at hand.
  +
  +
[[:category: notable articles|Notable articles]] are slightly outside of this hierarchy. They are simply a tag which indicates the '''importance''' of an article, instead of its actual quality. These should aim to be Exemplary.
   
 
[[category: administration]]
  
[[category: administration]]

Please note that all contributions to The Coppermind are considered to be released under the CC4 by-nc-nd (see Coppermind:Copyrights for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following CAPTCHA:

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)

Template used on this page:

Retrieved from "https://coppermind.net/wiki/Category:Article_statuses"