Difference between revisions of "Talk:Endowment"

From The Coppermind
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 3: Line 3:
 
:Does any WOB or annotation explain precisely what its intent is? --[[User:Alicila|Alicila]]
 
:Does any WOB or annotation explain precisely what its intent is? --[[User:Alicila|Alicila]]
 
::Nope, there would only be supposition. I know gatorgirl only removed the intent section because it was empty. -- [[User:Chaos2651|Chaos2651]] ([[User talk:Chaos2651|talk]]) 11:02, 18 February 2019 (MST)
 
::Nope, there would only be supposition. I know gatorgirl only removed the intent section because it was empty. -- [[User:Chaos2651|Chaos2651]] ([[User talk:Chaos2651|talk]]) 11:02, 18 February 2019 (MST)
  +
  +
== Endowement Tempting Hoid ==
  +
  +
The statement as on the page currently is perfectly suitable and accurately reports the information given. No where does the site suggest this was the Shard offered to Hoid, only that it is the one he would have taken if he wanted to be a Vessel. There is no reason for it's removal.--[[User:Debarra|Debarra]] ([[User talk:Debarra|talk]]) 11:36, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 11:36, 6 January 2023

does anyone know its intent?

What do you mean? It's a subject to a lot of interpretation. Presumably about giving. -- Chaos2651 (talk) 00:47, 18 February 2019 (MST)
Does any WOB or annotation explain precisely what its intent is? --Alicila
Nope, there would only be supposition. I know gatorgirl only removed the intent section because it was empty. -- Chaos2651 (talk) 11:02, 18 February 2019 (MST)

Endowement Tempting Hoid

The statement as on the page currently is perfectly suitable and accurately reports the information given. No where does the site suggest this was the Shard offered to Hoid, only that it is the one he would have taken if he wanted to be a Vessel. There is no reason for it's removal.--Debarra (talk) 11:36, 6 January 2023 (UTC)