4,172
edits
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Surgebinding"
m
no edit summary
Windrunner (talk | contribs) m |
|||
|
:Oops, I didn't see this here; I had posted my response to you on your talk page, Isomere. I agree the theory is strongly premature. In fact I am uncomfortable with any theory on here that claims to know additional Surges, just as I would be uncomfortable with putting what people think could be Shards on the Shard page. Additionally, regarding Cultivation's relevance to Surgebinding, I'm... also uncomfortable with that claim. I am very certain that we can say that Surgebinding is of Honor, but I am uncomfortable displaying that it is of Cultivation as well without more concrete evidence. -- [[User:Chaos2651|Chaos2651]] ([[User talk:Chaos2651|talk]]) 01:08, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
::I strongly agree with all of this. I'm not sure Isomere's seeing the talk page though, perhaps we'd better PM him? --[[User:Windrunner|Windrunner]] ([[User talk:Windrunner|talk]]) 02:50, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
| |||