Page history
Talk: Sigzil
15 October 2023
no edit summary
+420
→Sigzil may not be a Skybreaker: Alright, glad to see everyone's all on the same page now (also, adjusting indent level to at least be a reply to the first message mentioning the highspren quote)
m+2
→Sigzil may not be a Skybreaker
+517
14 October 2023
→Sigzil may not be a Skybreaker: Don't stress about it, Firesong :)
m+340
no edit summary
+664
→Sigzil may not be a Skybreaker: Consensus for now is that he is a Skybreaker; at this point, if you have arguments otherwise, please see what other people think first and don't edit war
+3,203
Slight formatting adjustments; substantive comment coming in a bit
m+265
no edit summary
m+74
no edit summary
m+35
no edit summary
+19
no edit summary
+597
no edit summary
+33
Formatting of the talk page to make different speakers more clear.
+10
no edit summary
+81
no edit summary
+1,028
→Sigzil May not be a skybreaker
+241
→Sigzil May not be a skybreaker
+1
→Sigzil May not be a skybreaker
+183
→Sigzil May not be a skybreaker: new section
+382