Page history
19 August 2014
18 August 2014
14 August 2014
12 July 2014
5 July 2014
25 January 2014
If you *really* insist on it, I'll make a topic on 17S that says the exact same thing.
m-58
This is under theory, and is clearly labeled, so does not warrant a dispute tag.
m-38
1 October 2013
20 September 2013
→Relationship with Magic Systems
m+58
→Shardholder of Endowment: woops
m+1
→Shardholder of Endowment
m+72
→Splinter
m+22
→Known Shards
m→Known Shards
19 August 2013
23 June 2013
13 June 2013
2 June 2013
6 May 2013
24 April 2013
23 April 2013
16 December 2012
→Known Shards
m-35
→Known Shards
m+35
→Known Shards
m-35
→Known Shards
m+23
→Known Shards
m+23
→Known Shards
m-11
→Known Shards: Added description of an as-yet-unknown Shard's intent, courtesy of Chaos' clues.
+216
8 December 2012
19 November 2012
3 November 2012
1 November 2012
22 October 2012
29 September 2012
25 August 2012
→Relationship with Magic Systems
m+1
no edit summary
+239
The citation was wrong, now it is correct.
m→Weaknesses: woops
m-16
→Weaknesses: +?
m+20
→Theories and Speculation
+1,495
no edit summary
+859
→Forms and Subdivisions
m+1
7 June 2012
no edit summary
mRestored paragraph structure to help my mind think properly about content, also removed a theory that was proven false
-304