Difference between revisions of "Sanderson's Laws of Magic"

Standardised the law heading summaries, minor alteration to the reference to the Laws of Robotics
(Standardised the law heading summaries, minor alteration to the reference to the Laws of Robotics)
 
== [[bws: sandersons-first-law|Sanderson's First Law]] ==
 
: '''An author's ability to solve conflict with magic is DIRECTLY PROPORTIONAL to how well the reader understands said magic.'''
 
If characters (especially viewpoint characters) solve a problem by use of magic, the reader should be made to understand how that magic works. Otherwise, the magic can constitute a ''deus ex machina''.
 
 
== [[bws: sandersons-second-law|Sanderson's Second Law]] ==
 
: '''Limitations > Power'''
 
The limitations of a magic system are more interesting than its capabilities. What the magic ''can't'' do is more interesting than what it ''can''.
=== Limitations ===
 
== [[bws: sandersons-third-law-of-magic|Sanderson's Third Law]] ==
 
: '''Expand on what you have already, before you add something new.'''
 
"A brilliant magic system for a book is less often one with a thousand different powers and abilities -- and is more often a magic system with relatively few powers that the author has considered in depth."
Brandon has, in his online lectures, described his ultimate rule as that of making magic "awesome" (in the colloquial sense), and further implied that said "awesomeness" takes precedence over exact obedience to the other three laws.{{wob ref|6227}}
 
(ThisThe refersnaming of this law is a reference to Isaac Asimov's Zeroth Law of his Three Laws of Robotics.)
 
== Notes ==
Editors
22

edits