Difference between revisions of "Coppermind talk:Editor's Corner"

Revision as of 17:33, 19 April 2015

Stub to Complete Ratio is misleading.

Stub to Complete Ratio is 1.164. That 0.917 is Stub to Complete + Nearing Completion.

I think it should be 1.164 or 0.711 which is Stub to Complete + Nearing Completion + Partially Complete.

Agreed, I thought of this last night and I'll be reverting it soon. -- Chaos2651 (talk) 11:33, 19 April 2015 (MDT)

Revision as of 17:28, 19 April 2015 (edit) Boosiv (talk \| contribs) (Created page with "Stub to Complete Ratio is misleading. Stub to Complete Ratio is 1.164. That 0.917 is Stub to Complete + Nearing Completion. I think it should be 1.164 or 0.711 which is Stub...")		Revision as of 17:33, 19 April 2015 (edit) (undo) Chaos2651 (talk \| contribs) Newer edit →
Line 5:		Line 5:

	I think it should be 1.164 or 0.711 which is Stub to Complete + Nearing Completion + Partially Complete.		I think it should be 1.164 or 0.711 which is Stub to Complete + Nearing Completion + Partially Complete.
		+
		+	:Agreed, I thought of this last night and I'll be reverting it soon. -- [[User:Chaos2651\|Chaos2651]] ([[User talk:Chaos2651\|talk]]) 11:33, 19 April 2015 (MDT)