Difference between revisions of "User talk:Merlin Milvus"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "==Capitalization of Cosmere== Hello there. I am well aware of the capitalization of cosmere as I wrote the current draft of the cosmere article. It is important to me that the...") |
m |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Capitalization of Cosmere== |
==Capitalization of Cosmere== |
||
− | Hello there. I am well aware of the capitalization of cosmere as I wrote the current draft of the cosmere article. It is important to me that the opening paragraph is consistently lowercase, especially the opening sentence, to the in-universe version |
+ | Hello there. I am well aware of the capitalization of cosmere as I wrote the current draft of the cosmere article. It is important to me that the opening paragraph is consistently lowercase, especially the opening sentence, to the in-universe version. The Coppermind will generally default to the lowercase capitalization. For a person who is not cosmere-aware switching the capitalization will be inherently confusing. Please keep it the way it is and do not change it, especially not in the introduction. -- [[User:Chaos2651|Chaos2651]] ([[User talk:Chaos2651|talk]]) 07:58, 24 June 2018 (MST) |
− | The Coppermind will generally default to the lowercase capitalization. For a person who is not cosmere-aware switching the capitalization will be inherently confusing. Please keep it the way it is and do not change it, especially not in the introduction. -- [[User:Chaos2651|Chaos2651]] ([[User talk:Chaos2651|talk]]) 07:58, 24 June 2018 (MST) |
Revision as of 14:59, 24 June 2018
Capitalization of Cosmere
Hello there. I am well aware of the capitalization of cosmere as I wrote the current draft of the cosmere article. It is important to me that the opening paragraph is consistently lowercase, especially the opening sentence, to the in-universe version. The Coppermind will generally default to the lowercase capitalization. For a person who is not cosmere-aware switching the capitalization will be inherently confusing. Please keep it the way it is and do not change it, especially not in the introduction. -- Chaos2651 (talk) 07:58, 24 June 2018 (MST)