Difference between revisions of "User talk:Shivertongue"
no edit summary
Shivertongue (talk | contribs) (→Block) |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
|
~Shiv, 17thShard Administrator.
----
Like I said Communication is the key, which is why I contacted [[User:Fbstj]] on issues I encountered or disagreed with. Which is relevant to this case as well, if you or any of the admins(or users) have concerns about what you consider "Behavior towards editors" or "disruptive editing", you should indeed raise those concerns with user involved, here is [[User_talk:Mbg|my communication page]]. As for the rest:
* I assume that you refered to my suggestion, on the welcome page discussion page. I posted that suggestion, because it would change current structure and was looking for input on possible solution to issues and pro/cos of the systems, from people who has more hands on experience with current system. A suggestion I haven't acted upon and have no intention to until a proper documentation will be provided. (Which is where I intended to take that discussion, which slide to personal nature, without any moderation on part of the admins) My only disregard was to "I like it better.." comments and those of personal nature.
* The only additions I made in relation to categories, were standard sub categorization as part of the current system. Same as other users has done in this time period.(if you make private plans, don't expect the other to know what they are ).
* Additionally, Admins should add notes on their user pages, so that they are recognize. Like so many other issues I noted, we are not mind readers and cannot be expected to know who is an administrator, because the people who have been here for years do.(I just found out that Chaos2651 is an admin as well as Fbstj).
* While admins can do what they want, it is considered smart or common courtesy if you wish, to leave edit summaries when you undo another person changes. To avoid similar mistakes in the future, by other users on this and other templates. Besides I know that with reverts(no confirmation), sometimes people hit it by mistake. Which is why I try to resolve the issue through discussion ([http://coppermind.net/wiki/User_talk:Fbstj#Revert User_talk:Fbstj#Revert]) and was ignored.
* As for standards, I consider communication to be part of it, not bulling people because it is your way and everyone should know it.
As a side note, Like I said on that other page I always found adhominem arguments to be a poor man tool, especially when a person starts his argument with it. --Mbg
| |||