Editing Talk:Nahel bond

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 2: Line 2:
Please leave the "spren type" for and Bondsmiths as "unique" at this time. The type isn't "unknown"--we likely know as much as we ever will about what "type" of spren Stormfather is. And "Bondsmith" or "Bondsmith spren" isn't quite right either, and doesn't tell anything besides the obvious. "Unique" expresses the fact that there are no other spren of it's type. --[[User:Jofwu|Jofwu]] ([[User talk:Jofwu|talk]]) 19:48, 12 December 2017 (MST)
Please leave the "spren type" for and Bondsmiths as "unique" at this time. The type isn't "unknown"--we likely know as much as we ever will about what "type" of spren Stormfather is. And "Bondsmith" or "Bondsmith spren" isn't quite right either, and doesn't tell anything besides the obvious. "Unique" expresses the fact that there are no other spren of it's type. --[[User:Jofwu|Jofwu]] ([[User talk:Jofwu|talk]]) 19:48, 12 December 2017 (MST)


=={{t|attention}}==
That's fine I disagree that is all we will ever know but unqiue works but Nale should still be on that list and the Renarin's Spren is corrupted. -- Arook
Might be me, but is this really a page needing urgent attention, when everything that is known about the Nahel bond is on it? There is nothing more than the two citations in the book. Everything that would be added is speculation. --[[User:Telcontar|Telcontar]] ([[User talk:Telcontar|talk]]) 19:31, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
: Removed --[[User:Fbstj|Joe ST]] ([[User talk:Fbstj|talk]]) 06:43, 8 November 2012 (UTC)


==Delete?==
==Abilities granted by Stormlight==
Cem, would you please explain your reasoning as to why you added a delete tag to this page? While I could see it being merged, but I think this needs to be discussed first, before the delete tag should have been added?--[[User:WeiryWriter|WeiryWriter]] ([[User talk:WeiryWriter|talk]]) 18:37, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
There's a strange line that's been there for a while saying that stormlight doesn't give people skill with a sword. It just seems wholly unnecessary. I mean we could list literally millions of things that stormlight *doesn't* do. Why even have that specific line?
:My reasoning is Nahel bond is an intrinsic part of Surgebinding and should definitely be discussed on that page. Also as far as I'm aware of, only the bond between spren and the Surgebinder is called the Nahel bond, so its existence is entirely dependent on Surgebinding, if that makes sense. I doubt if I managed to put everything we know on the Surgebinding article, but I think I at least covered a significant amount of it. If there's missing stuff, it can and should be added to Surgebinding, because it directly involves Surgebinding itself. So I don't think there's any point to having the same content in two different places.--[[User:Cem|Cem]] ([[User talk:Cem|talk]]) 00:24, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
:: It depends on how big the section ends up being imo. I see your point cem but I would hold that it would be better as it's own page --[[User:Fbstj|Joe ST]] ([[User talk:Fbstj|talk]]) 08:34, 25 March 2014 (UTC)


== Nightblood a spren? ==
==Definition of Nahel Bond==
It turns out Mr. Sanderson uses the term Nahel bond for Ryshadium and greatshells as well,{{wob ref|14509}} which makes me wonder if we aren't using it too narrowly. I feel that we should change the name of this page to Radiant bond. --Niser, using a different computer


Someone has listed Nightblood as a spren for Szeth with no citation. Seems like speculation, and though an interesting one, it seems misleading if there isn't source confirmation.
:The plan is to expand this page to fully cover the meaning of "Nahel bond." --[[User:Stargazer|Stargazer]] ([[User talk:Stargazer|talk]]) 16:06, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Here's an interesting thread on the topic of Nightblood, saying it's a splinter, a "robot spren", and a shardblade. http://www.17thshard.com/forum/topic/56565-nightblood-a-splinter/ Not sure if this is canon.

Please note that all contributions to The Coppermind are considered to be released under the CC4 by-nc-nd (see Coppermind:Copyrights for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following CAPTCHA:

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)