Editing Talk:Iriali
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
:::: Could it not be said just as well that the evidence for multiple groups is the lack of evidence that there is only one group? Why assume anything at all? Why present information as factual that we already know isn't confirmed, instead of just saying, it could be one of a few possibilities? What is gained by presenting speculation as fact? -- [[User:Oudeis]] 19:39, 6 January 2023 (UTC) |
:::: Could it not be said just as well that the evidence for multiple groups is the lack of evidence that there is only one group? Why assume anything at all? Why present information as factual that we already know isn't confirmed, instead of just saying, it could be one of a few possibilities? What is gained by presenting speculation as fact? -- [[User:Oudeis]] 19:39, 6 January 2023 (UTC) |
||
::::: Personally I do not think that presenting anything not 100% confirmed as speculation would be a good move. At the end of the day a large amount of content is not 100% confirmed by the books or Brandon themselves, most of the site would probably have to be tagged for one reason or another under this policy. In cases like this consensus would seem best to follow and the current consensus seems to be that there is most probably only one Irali group.--[[User:Debarra|Debarra]] ([[User talk:Debarra|talk]]) 19:44, 6 January 2023 (UTC) |