Editing Talk:Cytoverse

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 10: Line 10:
 
:Here's the complete list of planets (sorry, can't make it indent):
 
:Here's the complete list of planets (sorry, can't make it indent):
 
<dynamicpagelist>
 
<dynamicpagelist>
category = Cytoverse
+
category = Skyward Universe
 
category = Celestial bodies
 
category = Celestial bodies
 
count = 6
 
count = 6
Line 17: Line 17:
   
 
::I don't think it's worth listing all of them to be honest, most of these can be considered minor mentions and if we keep getting mentions like this, we'll end up with a list cluttered by rather unimportant articles. I think it's better to just list the important ones instead, it would also allow for flexibility in giving short descriptions I think, whereas if they're all listed, descriptions get out of hand very quickly. Using 'locations' instead of 'planets' will also make it easier to include places such as Starsight and any weird mumbo jumbo places that might be found in the nowhere (which may not be planets). Also gonna tag @[[User:Rasarr]] to bring her into this conversation as she created this page. :) (Also Stargazer, I've just closed off you <-b->'s so the edit box wasn't completely pink, hopefully that is okay with you :)) [[User:LadyLameness|LadyLameness]] ([[User talk:LadyLameness|talk]]) 19:30, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
 
::I don't think it's worth listing all of them to be honest, most of these can be considered minor mentions and if we keep getting mentions like this, we'll end up with a list cluttered by rather unimportant articles. I think it's better to just list the important ones instead, it would also allow for flexibility in giving short descriptions I think, whereas if they're all listed, descriptions get out of hand very quickly. Using 'locations' instead of 'planets' will also make it easier to include places such as Starsight and any weird mumbo jumbo places that might be found in the nowhere (which may not be planets). Also gonna tag @[[User:Rasarr]] to bring her into this conversation as she created this page. :) (Also Stargazer, I've just closed off you <-b->'s so the edit box wasn't completely pink, hopefully that is okay with you :)) [[User:LadyLameness|LadyLameness]] ([[User talk:LadyLameness|talk]]) 19:30, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
 
:::Yep, agree on all that. Also, didn't realize that's how break tags work and apparently my screen doesn't do the going pink thing, because that's news to me. I have absolutely no complaints about you doing that though.<br>--[[User:Stargazer|Stargazer]] ([[User talk:Stargazer|talk]]) 19:35, 21 February 2020 (UTC)</br>
 
 
:::Inhabitants could have a "notable locations" subsection, sure. Not sure why I didn't consider it myself - possibly because a lot of said notable locations (Earth, Detritus, Starsight) are already in the navbox? Still, if we feel like adding it would be useful, why not. [[User:Rasarr|Rasarr]] ([[User talk:Rasarr|talk]]) 23:50, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
 

Please note that all contributions to The Coppermind are considered to be released under the CC4 by-nc-nd (see Coppermind:Copyrights for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following CAPTCHA:

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)