Editing Talk:Allomancy
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 104: | Line 104: | ||
:--[[User:Stargazer|Stargazer]] ([[User talk:Stargazer|talk]]) 08:21, 14 November 2021 (UTC) |
:--[[User:Stargazer|Stargazer]] ([[User talk:Stargazer|talk]]) 08:21, 14 November 2021 (UTC) |
||
:[[User:Stargazer|Stargazer]], previewing the change with the {{t|for}} above the table, I do like that and think it addresses the "hard to see it" problem! Definitely open to other people's opinions as well. |
|||
:--[[User:Wajeemba|Wajeemba]] ([[User talk:Wajeemba|talk]]) 08:42, 14 November 2021 (UTC) |
|||
== Quote an excerpt from the God Metal page? == |
== Quote an excerpt from the God Metal page? == |
||
Line 119: | Line 119: | ||
::[[User:Stargazer|Stargazer]], makes sense to me. Summarizing the relevant portions sounds great! That's good info on quoting within a wiki. To clarify, does the Coppermind use the same licensing scheme as Wikipedia? I guess I should also clarify that by wiki I meant the Coppermind God Metals article, though you may have picked up on that. |
::[[User:Stargazer|Stargazer]], makes sense to me. Summarizing the relevant portions sounds great! That's good info on quoting within a wiki. To clarify, does the Coppermind use the same licensing scheme as Wikipedia? I guess I should also clarify that by wiki I meant the Coppermind God Metals article, though you may have picked up on that. |
||
:: |
::[[User:Wajeemba|Wajeemba]] ([[User talk:Wajeemba|talk]]) 08:27, 14 November 2021 (UTC) |
||
:::[[User:Wajeemba|Wajeemba]], yeah, I picked up on that; sorry I should have been clearer that I was still talking about the Coppermind aside from that reference to Wikipedia's policy. Contributions to the Coppermind are released under a [[Coppermind:Copyrights|Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license]] which in this respect should be similar to the [[wikipedia:Wikipedia:Copyrights|Creative Commons BY-SA 3.0 license]] Wikipedia appears to mostly use, so I imagine basically the same policy would apply (and it seems respectful and not particularly onerous to comply with), though I am not a lawyer. |
:::[[User:Wajeemba|Wajeemba]], yeah, I picked up on that; sorry I should have been clearer that I was still talking about the Coppermind aside from that reference to Wikipedia's policy. Contributions to the Coppermind are released under a [[Coppermind:Copyrights|Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license]] which in this respect should be similar to the [[wikipedia:Wikipedia:Copyrights|Creative Commons BY-SA 3.0 license]] Wikipedia appears to mostly use, so I imagine basically the same policy would apply (and it seems respectful and not particularly onerous to comply with), though I am not a lawyer. |