Editing Coppermind talk:Editor's Corner

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 1: Line 1:
== Stub to Complete Ratio ==
Stub to Complete Ratio is misleading.
Stub to Complete Ratio is misleading.


Line 14: Line 13:


Fairly self explanatory. I will put up the same argument on the Coppermind section of 17th Shard, but there is no point having a link to a category that doesn't exist.--[[User:TheYoungBard|TheYoungBard]] ([[User talk:TheYoungBard|talk]]) 00:31, 18 June 2015 (MDT)
Fairly self explanatory. I will put up the same argument on the Coppermind section of 17th Shard, but there is no point having a link to a category that doesn't exist.--[[User:TheYoungBard|TheYoungBard]] ([[User talk:TheYoungBard|talk]]) 00:31, 18 June 2015 (MDT)
: We're currently in a transition period, thanks for bringing this up tho :D --[[User:Fbstj|Joe ST]] ([[User talk:Fbstj|talk]]) 00:52, 18 June 2015 (MDT)

== Missing Articles ==

The majority of missing articles are links to [[Words of Radiance/Timeline‏‎]]. It looks like all of these come from the Words of Radiance summary pages (the separate pages for each chapter). I don't see an obvious way to fix it, but this looks like low-hanging fruit to get the missing article count down. [[User:Hadhad|Hadhad]] ([[User talk:Hadhad|talk]]) 08:19, 24 May 2016 (MDT)
:I've been meaning to do a re-read of WoR so I can finish building/referencing this. Looks like I'll need to bump this up in priority.--[[User:WeiryWriter|WeiryWriter]] ([[User talk:WeiryWriter|talk]]) 08:58, 25 May 2016 (MST)
::And just to be annoying, I changed the thing so it now counts all the (main namespace) articles that are missing rather than all the redlinks (aka each missing page is only counted once). --[[User:Fbstj|Joe ST]] ([[User talk:Fbstj|talk]]) 13:07, 27 May 2016 (MST)

== Ref error in Camon ==

... but I don't know how to repair it. --[[Special:Contributions/2003:CB:F723:1B00:E1EF:E3B2:2CBC:52AD|2003:CB:F723:1B00:E1EF:E3B2:2CBC:52AD]] 07:56, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

: Could you go into more detail on this? What is the error? Also, we probably should have done this on the [[Talk:Camon]] page but this is fine for now. -- [[User:Chaos2651|Chaos2651]] ([[User talk:Chaos2651|talk]]) 04:30, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

== Visual distinction between Cosmere and non-Cosmere works + title uniformity ==

Would it be possible to put a visual distinction (maybe a line or a larger space or something like that) between the Cosmere and non-Cosmere works on the start page?

In the same section I'd suggest to keep the books' or series' titles uniformly. For example right now some are using the full title (like The Emperor's Soul or Sixth Of The Dusk) while others are abbreviated (like Tress or Stormlight Archive) [[User:PanicPug|PanicPug]] ([[User talk:PanicPug|talk]]) 17:42, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

:[[User:PanicPug|PanicPug]], just to clarify, you're talking about [[Coppermind:Welcome]] not [[Coppermind:Editor's Corner]], right? --[[User:Stargazer|Stargazer]] ([[User talk:Stargazer|talk]]) 18:20, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

Yes, exactly, sorry I didn't clarify that, didn't know where else to put it [[User:PanicPug|PanicPug]] ([[User talk:PanicPug|talk]]) 17:21, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

Please note that all contributions to The Coppermind are considered to be released under the CC4 by-nc-nd (see Coppermind:Copyrights for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following CAPTCHA:

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)