Difference between revisions of "Talk:Dilaf"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "The history section dealing with the events of the book feels a bit over-detailed and has a lot of information not relevant to Dilaf. Among other things it should prolly just...") |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The history section dealing with the events of the book feels a bit over-detailed and has a lot of information not relevant to Dilaf. Among other things it should prolly just end at his death. I guess maybe "and then his coup was stopped" is still relevant. |
The history section dealing with the events of the book feels a bit over-detailed and has a lot of information not relevant to Dilaf. Among other things it should prolly just end at his death. I guess maybe "and then his coup was stopped" is still relevant. |
||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | :Yeah I think it reads better now. I think that having a brief conclusion of the affects of his death is good, though the shortened version you made is much better.[[User:Taln Fan|Taln Fan]] ([[User talk:Taln Fan|talk]]) 20:13, 19 February 2022 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 20:14, 19 February 2022
The history section dealing with the events of the book feels a bit over-detailed and has a lot of information not relevant to Dilaf. Among other things it should prolly just end at his death. I guess maybe "and then his coup was stopped" is still relevant.