Difference between revisions of "Talk:Dilaf"

From The Coppermind
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "The history section dealing with the events of the book feels a bit over-detailed and has a lot of information not relevant to Dilaf. Among other things it should prolly just...")
 
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
The history section dealing with the events of the book feels a bit over-detailed and has a lot of information not relevant to Dilaf. Among other things it should prolly just end at his death. I guess maybe "and then his coup was stopped" is still relevant.
 
The history section dealing with the events of the book feels a bit over-detailed and has a lot of information not relevant to Dilaf. Among other things it should prolly just end at his death. I guess maybe "and then his coup was stopped" is still relevant.
  +
  +
  +
:Yeah I think it reads better now. I think that having a brief conclusion of the affects of his death is good, though the shortened version you made is much better.[[User:Taln Fan|Taln Fan]] ([[User talk:Taln Fan|talk]]) 20:13, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 20:14, 19 February 2022

The history section dealing with the events of the book feels a bit over-detailed and has a lot of information not relevant to Dilaf. Among other things it should prolly just end at his death. I guess maybe "and then his coup was stopped" is still relevant.


Yeah I think it reads better now. I think that having a brief conclusion of the affects of his death is good, though the shortened version you made is much better.Taln Fan (talk) 20:13, 19 February 2022 (UTC)